Merton Council

Home Home Merton Adult Education Home Home Jobs in children's social care Home Merton Means Business Home Wandle Valley Low Carbon Zone Home Safeguarding Children Board
How do I contact my councillor?

Agenda item

Chimichanga, 80 The Broadway, Wimbledon, SW19 1RH

Minutes:

The Chair outlined the procedure to be followed and advised all present that the meeting was being audio recorded.

 

All parties confirmed they had received the bundle in advance of the meeting.

 

Speaking on behalf of the applicant, James Rankin presented the application in detail.  He apologised that consultation had not been undertaken with Police and local residents prior to the submission of the application, but a meeting had taken place on 8 November.  He emphasised that the applicant’s intention is not for the premises to operate as a bar, but would like to be able to offer customers the opportunity to have a drink in the bar prior to being seated for their meal, and if moved from their table, after their meal.

 

James Rankin pointed out that Condition 3 in Annex 3 could arguably allow for someone purchasing a drink before sitting down at their table, as that could be interpreted as drinking with a table meal. 

 

Councillor John Sargeant expressed concern that allowing customers to purchase alcohol in the bar area after their meal could lead to them remaining on the premises until much later than they normally would.  In response James Rankin suggested that the Licensing Sub-Committee may wish to impose a time limit, beyond which time alcohol may no longer be sold. 

 

In response to the representation from the Metropolitan Police, James Rankin indicated that the applicant was willing to accept suggested conditions 2 to 5.  With regard to suggested condition 1, he described the operational challenges in complying with it.

 

In response to the representation from LB Merton Public Health, James Rankin indicated that the applicant would accept proposed conditions 1, 4, 5, 7 and 8, but noted that 4 and 7 are already conditions on the licence.  He suggested that conditions 2 and 3 represent over-regulation and would be challenging to manage. 

 

PC Russ Stevens introduced his representation, highlighting his concern that the premises may end up as a bar, or appear to be a bar, rather than a restaurant.  He noted his agreement to customers drinking on the premises prior to a meal, but raised concerns about them purchasing alcohol after a meal, or only purchasing a small meal, then moving into the bar area until closing time.   PC Russ Stevens went through the suggested conditions and gave further explanation where required.   

 

Dr Aalaa Jawad introduced the representation made by LB Merton Public Health, and responded to questions posed by the Sub-Committee. 

 

Councillor Abdul Latif, speaking on behalf of the Trinity ward councillors, introduced the representation in detail, noting concern that this application would add to anti-social behaviour in the CIZ, which is already saturated with licensed premises. 

 

Sara Sharp outlined her representation, noting her concern that the staff at the premises would struggle to ensure that those having a drink were going to have, or had eaten, a meal, particularly given the high turnover of staff.  She advised that no other restaurant on The Broadway has a bar area, and to grant the variation would set a precedent in the area. 

 

Leigh Terrafranca presented her representation, made on behalf of WEHRA and the Wimbledon Union of Residents, which cover around 15,000 households.  She described the proliferation of licensed premises on The Broadway and the impact of their customers upon local residents, especially at weekends.  She suggested that the premises would become a bar, and asked the Sub-Committee to refuse the application.

 

At the invitation of the Chair, all parties were given the opportunity to sum up.  At 12.00 pm, the Sub-Committee retired into private session to take legal advice and make their decision.

 

The meeting was reconvened at 12.55 pm.  The Legal Adviser, Guy Bishop gave a brief outline of legal advice he had given to the Sub-Committee.

 

The Chair relayed the decision of the Licensing Sub-Committee and advised that written notification would be issued to all parties.

 

RESOLVED:  That the application is granted, subject to conditions, as detailed within the Notice of Determination.

 

Supporting documents: